Albuquerque District Header


Home > Media > News Stories

Posted 12/1/2012

Bookmark and Share Email Print

By James Campbell
Public Affairs, U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville

In September, Albuquerque District Project Manager Trent Simpler and Geologist Mark Phaneuf joined a team from U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville, Ala., to collect bomb data at two Florida museums.

Huntsville Center is capturing and cataloging what may best be described as the fingerprints of munitions items, such as bombs, mortars, artillery projectiles and fuzes, in an effort to improve how work is done at Formerly Used Defense Sites. The Center’s Environmental and Munitions Center of Expertise (EM CX) has begun to put together a library of ordnance signatures.

To help with Corps’ cleanup work at the former Kirtland Bombing Range on Albuquerque’s West Mesa, the team traveled to the National Naval Aviation Museum in Pensacola, Fla., and the Air Force Armament Museum at Fort Walton Beach, Fla. In both places, they had what the team needed – inert bombs from the World War II era with fins, fuzes and metal intact. Since the museums couldn’t release the exhibit pieces to the Center, the team brought the equipment to the bombs.

“A central challenge when remediating sites where military live-fire training took place is properly classifying anomalies, or signatures, from high-end metal detection equipment,” said Andrew Schwartz, geophysicist, from the Center’s EM CX. “It’s the difference between unnecessarily excavating an area and finding junk metal or being certain of what’s down there. The newest sensors have the potential to reduce excavation on some sites by more than 75 percent.”

That’s one reason the team went to the museums in Florida where the team collected advanced electromagnetic induction signatures for various bombs and bomb fuzes using MetalMapper and the Time-domain Electromagnetic Multi-sensor Towed Array Detection System, Schwartz added.

The specialized equipment gathers complex geophysical data about the objects – data Schwartz said he likes to call metal detector fingerprints. It’s still metal detection, but the specialized equipment can determine metal types, thickness and symmetry.

The bombs in question are 100-pound general purpose, practice bombs and spotting charges last dropped at what was then a U.S. Army Air Corps bombing range, last used for this type of training in 1947.

The former range is part of an area where an airport expansion is scheduled, and the Albuquerque District is managing the remediation project.

Once complete, this will be the first use of the technology on a FUDS project, Simpler said.

The trip to the museum to gather the old bombs’ data fingerprints was funded by the Albuquerque District project, but it also benefits a library the team hopes will grow to be a standard classification for subsurface items that may be unexploded ordnance.

It’s said that human fingerprints are unique, but in the case of ordnance multiple data sets are needed for one type of munitions. Schwartz said the current library has roughly 300 ordnance signatures that cover about 25 different pieces of ordnance and related clutter.

The EM CX is also working within the Department of Defense community of experts to standardize how the data is structured, Schwartz said.

“The library needs to be specific. For example, there are over a dozen different types of 81mm mortars, each with unique signatures, but if the library doesn’t have the signature for the one you’re looking for, you might not get a match,” he said.

These fingerprints or signatures will help the Corps investigate sites where ordnance was used and determine which pieces of metal can be safely left in the ground, freeing up more resources so the FUDS program can get to more sites sooner, said Amy Walker, a geophysicist on the team from the Center’s Engineering Directorate.

“In the larger sense, these new sensors provide advanced classification capabilities that weren’t there just a few years ago,” Walker said. “We’re still in initial stages, building up the library so we can understand what these items look like to the new sensors, but this is what’s next in munitions response. It’s an exciting time for the industry.”

From helping with a project involving a World War II-era bombing range in New Mexico to building a library that can help at locations everywhere, the Center team is counting on developing these complex fingerprints as one way to meet the multiple challenges of mitigating the risk from unexploded ordnance at current and former military sites.

Air Force Armament Museum bombs Corps of Engineers Environmental and Munitions Center of Expertise Florida formerly used defense sites FUDS Huntsville library military sites munitions National Naval Aviation Museum ordnance U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center USACE UXO